<$BlogRSDURL$>

Monday, January 31, 2005

Annan-a-rama... 

It's a cruel, cruel summer...when George Bush goes off on his own...

...sorry. Sometimes I just miss the 80's that much. Anyway, the conclusion of the American Prospect internal debate on Kofi Annan was finally published today, and three times is probably about as much as they can go around without too much repetition. During which, Ian Williams, defending Kofi Annan, gets off the funniest line ever:
Is Annan perfect? No. In my opinion, he concedes too much to Ariel Sharon and kowtows too much to Beijing, and there are indeed many people in the United Nations whom he should have fired long ago.
He concedes too much to Ariel Sharon?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

(Oh, and to back up the mockery - Israel is condemned by the UN more than North Korea, the Sudan, Iran, China, and for that matter every other country on earth COMBINED. In the midst of all the Israel-bashing, exactly when does Kofi have the time to smooch Sharon's ass?)

God Bless America...here's your 1040... 

...with apologies to Bill Engvall...

A few months ago, it was announced that the NAACP was being investigated for violating IRS requirements regarding non-partisanship from tax-exempt organizations.

The NAACP has announced that, in fact, it is the IRS that is a partisan organization, and this is so obvious that they will not be providing any documents for the IRS' investigation. Because if there's one group of government workers that just love the GOP, it's the tax collectors.

A statement assuring the public that the NAACP never, during any of its official functions, expressed an electoral preference between "the dynamically moderate war hero John Kerry", and the "unelected racist warmongering facist in training, George W. Bushitler." Because that would be wrong.

Hillary is fine... 

...Sen. Clinton even finished her speech. She just ate some bad clams or something.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

Iraqi election caveat.. 

One thing I thought of, but didn't put in my post earlier, is I wonder if the bad guys made the decision not to go after the voting, but are instead lurking to try and go after voters after leaving the polls. Having the voting go down the way it did is a huge smackdown to Zarqawi and his band, but they still have the means to hunt down people with blue fingers. The next couple of days will tell a more complete story as to how big a success the election was.

(Yeah, I'm gonna cross-post this too.)

Paint my finger blue and staple "Rah-Rah Republican Jingo Monkey" to my skull 

I'm thrilled with the results of Iraq's elections. Just about everything I'd read promised chaos on election day. I'd envisioned hundreds of deaths, poll stations hurredly shut down, Iraqis fearfully staying home...the whole nine. Roughly 35 people died in what was supposed to be Insurgent D-day, with the number going to 44 if you count the suicide bombers themselves, and you should not. Hubs and Spokes has a pretty good roundup of reaction to the vote, with Jeff Jarvis linking the reaction that really matters - that of Iraqis. They're thrilled. I'd say thrilled beyond words, but everyone is plenty capable of words, and it's wonderful to read them.

Turnout could be anywhere from 50 to 75 percent, depending on who you ask and when you ask them. 75% would be jaw-droppingly phenominal, 50% is pretty damn good when you recall that people were told by an insurgency we've been led to believe borders on omnipotence that voting would sign their death warrants. Besides, the projected turnout compares pretty well with other elections. Even sources not likely to say nice things about Iraq are optimistic. Kevin Drum has voiced cautious optimism, and even the family of a soldier killed in Iraq has praised the elections, seeing them as evidence that their son died in support of something worthwhile.

Of course, some people haven't lost sight of what really matters:
Looks reasonably successful so far, no mass casualties, turnout low only in a few trouble spots. It's time to prepare for three weeks of gloating from the hawks before they realize that nothing has really changed and they return to previous hawk practice of not mentioning Iraq.
Turnout was higher than expected, violence lower. But it also pleased George Bush, and to some people, nothing else going to matter quite as much.

Bulk of this cross-posted at Of the Mind.

This, that, and the other... 

I'll be guest blogging at Of the Mind this week, saying who knows what. Probably some variant of the crap I spew here, when I have an opinion on something Michael tended to write about.

I will cross-post if something is the sort of thing I'd have posted here as well (so if you want to declare Cube the winner of the guest blogger thing right now, go ahead), such as the whole Iraq thing. (I understand there was an election or something. I'll have to look into how that went.) Georgia stuff will probably go over there, the random personal obsessions that occasionally come up will stay here. If I start drinking again, any drunk-filled rants will be posted over there, and only cross posted here if it's still funny when I'm sober.

Oh, and the dog's name is Isabel, and she'll being going home tonight after I get back from work.

Sunday, January 30, 2005

Sorry, no grand story of triumph just yet... 

Poker tournament postponed due ice on the ground Saturday. This prompted the typical Atlanta reaction to inclement weather. (OH MY GOD! THERE'S ICE ON THE GROUND!!! EVERYONE RUN TO PUBLIX TO BUY BREAD!!!!) It also shut down the Shriners.

Stray dog is still here. We posted a few signs around the neighborhood, and have taken to calling her "Annie" (as in "Little Orphan...") to have something to say to her other than "Hey, you large yellow thing! Come here!" Since nobody's called, we're going to start looking to find a home for her ourselves. (Animal Control is out. They euthanize.) Once again, anyone in Metro Atl. who thinks they may have a place in their family, she's probably 6-10 months old, active, friendly yellow lab.

Friday, January 28, 2005

Anybody missing a dog? 

My wife leaves a message for me at work. It seems when she tried to leave for work, she was met by a stray dog. Being a much softer touch than I am when it comes to these things, (and you all know how nauseous I can get), she set the dog up in our backyard, so I come home and meet our new guest. She doesn't have a collar, but she looks well-fed, and she's very friendly, so I'm hoping her people live somewhere in our subdivision. (The plan to put up signs, etc., is slightly complicated by the fact that Atlanta's one annual outburst of winter weather is scheduled for tonight.) At the moment, looks like she might be with us a few days.

I hope we find her home. I know how sick I'd feel if my dogs were out somewhere and I didn't know if they were all right or not. But, if I can't find her home, then we'll have to find a home. Anyone in metro Atl. who thinks they might have room in their family for a female yellow lab, 6-10 months old, let me know.

Is this really a better way to make money than getting a job? 

Guy gets arrested trying to defraud McDonald's. What he allegedly did was this:
Antolos said Rodriguez purchased his meal and then went into the restroom, where he took a bite of the sandwich, spat it into the garbage, and then placed a row of staples and a paper clip in the other part of the sandwich. After rewrapping the sandwich, Rodriguez used a razor blade to slash the inside of his mouth.


He reportedly returned to the restaurant's eating area, pretended to take a bite out of his sandwich, and then screamed that he had been cut.


Dead money walking... 

This weekend, my wife and I will be competing in a more or less grown-up poker tournament. (The event is a fund-raiser for the Shriners.)

I read some "Poker for Morons" book and bet according to a list of acceptable hands, based on table position, relative chip stacks, and calculated pot odds. My wife plays a slightly more free-range version of poker, betting for reasons such as "I just had a gut feeling," and "to wipe the smirk of the face of the asswad across the table from me." She thinks my method is a joyless series of endless math problems. I think she's a lunatic.

Tomorrow, we learn who prevails!

(If this post disappears, you'll know the answer.)

Here goes... 

...Iraq elections have started, with overseas balloting beginning. That's just a prelim, of course, with the real test coming Sunday, as Iraqis have to decide whether to try an vote with Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi, who's convinced that it's un-Islamic to be anywhere but under his thumb, doing his best to disrupt things as much as possible. There are gains being made as well, but I don't think anyone can predict what's going to happen as far as turnout, or what the winners will do. I think whoever prevails will start talking U.S. withdrawl, pretty quickly.

And I remember in November, when I considered not going to vote in our election because it was raining.

What he said... 

Steve Chapman makes a great point on the death penalty. He writes about the case of Wilbert Rideau, just released from prison in Louisiana after his fourth murder trial for stabbing a woman in the chest after taking her hostage during a bank robbery. He also tried to kill two other hostages. His defense? "Oops." His death sentence was overturned when the Supreme Court briefly outlawed the death penalty in the 1970's, and his fourth retrial ended in a manslaughter verdict, setting Rideau free because the 21 year maximum for manslaughter was much less then the 44 years he'd already served after being convicted of murder.

Chapman's point is that Rideau's release puts the lie to a major argument against capital punishment: That killers will be put away for life.
"So why does capital punishment remain popular? One big reason is that many Americans don't believe life without parole really means life without parole. They fear that some way or another, by hook or by crook, some vicious killers will be allowed to walk the streets as free men."
Shouldn't he have gone free? He is, after all, the "most rehabilitated prisoner in America." Depends on your point of view, I guess. It's good he made use of his time in prison, but he did rob a bank, kidnap three people, shoot two of them, and stabbed the third to death. His victims were promised he would never see the light of day again. That promise has been broken.

Most death penalty opponents support life without parole as an alternative to execution, willing to promise that the killer will never see the light of day. They have to - it is only when life without parole is presented as an alternative that support for capital punishment begins to waver. Cynics like me don't believe it - we think that one day, sometime off in the future, someone will say, "you know, it happened so long ago, and the man who sits in prison today bears no resemblance to the man who committed those horrible acts. He's too old to be a threat to anyone, it costs too much to house him...," and the wheels will set in motion to break the promise. Maybe, when that time comes, on a case less inflammatory than Rideau's, death penalty opponents will prove the cynics wrong, and fight as hard to keep the killer in prison as they did to prevent his execution. If I could believe that - capital punishment could go away and I wouldn't miss it.

Tip - Malkin

Thursday, January 27, 2005

Beyond guilt... 

An article about the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz has to deal with the resurgence of Anti-Semitism in Europe today. Sure, there's talk of the victims, and honors for those who fought to close the death camp, but there's also this:
That commitment is all the more critical now because a growing number of Europe's young Muslims are resisting, even rejecting, efforts to teach them about the Holocaust, arguing that there is not enough attention paid to the killing of innocent Muslims by Israel or the United States-led coalitions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Teachers are reluctant to teach about the Holocaust in some schools, particularly in France, Belgium and Denmark. Mr. Shalev said that most of his organization's educational exchanges with France are now with the country's private Jewish institutions.
But of course, everyone swears they're doing something about anti-Semitism, after all, didn't we all jump on some spoiled British nitwit who wore a swastika armband?

I think one way to help ensure the lessons of Auschwitz survive is for everyone to stop trying to wring any more guilt out of the Germans. (This includes you, Gerhard.) "Why are we blamed for the Holocaust?" is exactly the wrong question for anyone who wasn't alive then to be asking. (Not that it helps, but the answer is "because it's easier than dealing with the people today who want to finish the job.") Making the question whose fault the Holocaust was allows present-day Germans to make the issue one of their victimization, rather than any kind of lesson on how to prevent a future one. To quote one of the editors in Stern, writing about the commemoration:
"If the memorializing of Auschwitz is to have a goal, it has to be to warn us about the dangers of totalitarianism. It is good that now there is a monument to the murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin. The victims don't need it -- we do."
The people who built, filled, and ran Auschwitz are, for the most part, dead. Pointing to their descendants and saying "you did this" is counterproductive when there are people alive today trying to do it again. Point to them. Because while the previous Holocaust may not have been our fault, preventing the next one remains our responsibility.

High Culture... 

Rumors are swirling that UPN will not renew WWE Smackdown when their current contract expires, citing claims that the show doesn't fit in with where UPN wants to go as a network. (Bankruptcy?) Don't draft those protest letters yet, other sources say UPN is nowhere near a decision.

With that in mind, let's look to this weekend's Royal Rumble, the best event on the WWE calendar and the second best idea the WWE ever had (first is reuniting Randy Savage and Miss Elizabeth at Wrestlemania VII). (Whatever your take on wrestling, you must, must watch the preview. (On the right side, click on the second one down here. Rey Misterio wearing a wig over his mask is one of the funniest things I've seen this year.) As to the card itself...

Shawn Michaels vs. Edge
Who Should Win: Edge - a solid win makes him a credible main eventer.
Who Will Win: Michaels - wrestling has office politics just like everyone else.
Will it Suck? This match will not suck.

Casket Match: Undertaker vs. Heidenreich
Who Should Win: Undertaker
Who Will Win: Undertaker
Will it Suck? And how.

Triple Threat Match for the Smackdown World Title: JBL vs. Kurt Angle vs. The Big Show
Who Should Win: JBL - to build up to him losing the title at Wrestlemania before wrestling's biggest audience.
Who Will Win: JBL - With Angle staying a bad guy, the only alternative result is Show winning, and I think the WWE has given up on Show as champion.
Will it Suck? - Possibly, but Kurt Angle can be a miracle worker when it comes to pulling off good matches.

For the RAW World Title: Triple H vs. Randy Orton
Who Should Win: Triple H - again to set up the big Wrestlemania Match
Who Will Win: Triple H is married to the boss' daughter. Him winning being good for business is just a pleasant bonus.
Will it Suck? - No, assuming Triple H is willing to make Orton look good in defeat.

30 Man Royal Rumble Match
Who Should Win: John Cena - the best hope the WWE currently has for a crossover celebrity a la the Rock, but needs to win the big one.
Who Will Win: Batista - Second best choice behind Cena, his ascent is admittedly a better story, however, the fact that he looks like a devil-worshipping serial killer makes him slightly less marketable. Plus, him winning makes Triple H's match at Wrestlemania the main event.
Will it Suck? The Royal Rumble never sucks.

Talk about a headline you never thought you'd see... 

Ringo Starr to become superhero. Ringo's partner in this venture is Stan Lee, the man who created Spider-Man.

To borrow a phrase from Comic Book Guy - "I think his mind is no longer in mint condition."

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Life...sort of... 

Delaware Supreme Court has ruled that "life" when applied prior to 1990, actually means "45 years", which is somewhat less than what I thought the normal lifespan was here in the U.S. Most people, I think, consider "life with possibility of parole", as being sentenced to your natural life, although you could be paroled if you met whatever criteria there happen to be, after serving a fixed minimum, however, if parole is not granted, you rot.

Not here. What the court did was put on one side, a statute saying that a "life sentence with the possibility of parole" was 45 years for the purpose of calculating eligibility for parole, added that to a separate statute that gave prisoners a right to conditional release when their fixed term expired, less good behavior credit, and came up with a system where "life in prison with possibility of parole" cannot in any circumstance be longer than 45 years, which, if not undone, will result in the surprise release of almost 200 people convicted of things like rape, murder, and kidnapping, with presumably few of them agreeing to relocate to Alabama.

Delaware lawmakers reacted about the way you'd expect, and legislation to unmake the decision is en route. And defense attorneys reacted the way you'd expect:
Defense attorney Joseph A. Gabay said legislators should study the issue before enacting laws to keep people in prison past their sentences.

"I think you go down a dangerous road when you start locking up people beyond their sentence," Gabay said. "If they serve their time, that's the price they paid."
Of course, probably nobody was sentenced to life in Delaware with the expectation that they would definitely be released in 45 years, less earned good time behavior.

The case is Evans v. State, and can be found here.

Steinberger vs. Williams, round two... 

I'm digging the Kofi Annan debate going on in the American Prospect Online. Today is part two. Steinberger points out something I'm surprised we don't hear more often from the left:
Bush has no desire to get rid of Annan; Annan is actually quite useful to the administration. In the minds of many Americans now, Annan is the corrupt, incompetent face of a corrupt, incompetent institution, and this is precisely how the Bushies want the United Nations to be seen.

It seems to me that the smart approach would be to call Bush’s bluff. The president has repeatedly said that he supports the United Nations and wishes to work with it. Clearly, though, the administration doesn’t want to work with Annan, and the secretary-general is obviously in no position at this point to wield any influence in Washington. If Annan quit or was forced to resign, the United States would have a great deal of say over the choice of a replacement, and I believe Bush would find it much harder to stiff the United Nations if it were his man or woman at the helm of the organization.
This recalls that "Put Vaclav Havel in charge" drive that briefly captured everyone's imagination. A step like that would definitely give the U.N. a much stronger position when it came to influencing the U.S. Of course, someone like Havel would probably use the U.N. for things other than trying to hamstring the U.S. and blaming Israel for everything, so it'd be a mixed bag. Honestly, except for a genuine effort to defend Annan over Darfur, Williams continues to have nothing to offer except the idea that everyone except Steinberger who has a problem with Kofi is a sinister force out to destroy multilateralism forever:
The only people who have called for his resignation (presumably, with the honorable exception of yourself) are a small but vociferous coterie in the United States, not one of whom has ever had a good word to say for the organization or for multilateralism. In effect, for Annan to go at their behest would be to hand over the choice of his successor to this same crowd whose sole aim is to see a United Nations totally subservient to fervent neoconservative dreams of empire -- or destroyed.
I wonder if the Democrats who had that "Come to Jesusland" meeting with Kofi a few weeks back are part of this "vociferous coterie."

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Hollywood connects with America... 

Hollywood takes out ad supporting giving illegal immigrants drivers' licenses.
...the ad features a picture of a Hispanic woman and two young children with the caption, "Nominated: Best Nanny in a Supporting Role," and reads:

"I am trusted every day to use my hands and my heart to nurture and care for children who are not my own. ... I am welcomed into the most personal parts of people's lives, but I'm not trusted with a license to drive a car."
The ad continued - "and if you do trust me with a driver's license, I promise to show the same respect to California traffic laws that I do to federal immigration laws."

Some of Hollywood's leading lights add their considerable rhetorical skill to the debate, such as "Million Dollar Baby" writer Paul Haggis:
"A lot of us in the entertainment business are terribly spoiled, and we live in a world where we are overprotected and overpaid," Haggis said. "At the same time, I think we have a duty to give voice to those who perhaps haven't the same access. It's about basic fairness."
He continued, "...and if we have to pay union scale for domestic and landscaping work, living in our overprotected, overpaid world just isn't that cost-effective."

There is a quote from an opponent of the Hollywood effort, Mike Spence:
"I think it's another example of how rich Hollywood elites are out of touch with what's going on in California," Spence said. "They don't see the impact of immigration unless it's hiring someone to help out with chores around their mansions ... and they're not in competition with illegal immigrants for jobs."
In the spirit of compromise, Spence offered to support a bill where immigration laws will be enforced with exactly the same fervor as anti-piracy and copyright protection laws. The Hollywood contingent had no comment on the counterproposal as of press time.





Po-tay-to, Po-tah-to 

Yahoo! News Headline: Hamas to Suspend Attacks Upon Conditions.

Actual words of story about a "softening" by Hamas:
Mashaal said Hamas, which has called for Israel to be replaced by an Islamic state, would agree to stop attacks if Israel ends "aggression, invasion, assassination, killings" and agrees to release all Palestinian prisoners. (emphasis added)
Alternative Headline Suggested by me: Hamas - We Ain't Suspending Shit

Oscar nominations! 

And the nominations are...a bunch of movies I didn't see. (Exception - Collateral, for which Jamie Foxx was nominated for Best Supporting Actor, which is cool, but I agree with everyone who can't figure out why that wasn't a lead role.) I would like to see "The Aviator", "Million Dollar Baby", "Hotel Rwanda", and "Ray" at some point.

Not seeing any of these movies is probably why I only went 12 for 19 picking Oscar nominations at the Hollywood Stock Exchange. (I knew Jim Caviezel and Laura Linney were long shots, but I thought for sure Paul Giamatti was a shoe-in. After American Splendor, what exactly does he have to do?)

The real contest is going to be in the Best Animated Film section, where Shrek 2 and the Incredibles go head to head. (I have seen these two - the Incredibles by a slight margin.)

Annan-aconda 

Bad headline puns - one more reason to love blogs.

The American Prospect is posting a liberal debate on whether or not Kofi Annan should go, with Michael Steinberger offering to help him pack, and Ian Williams offering to bear his children. (I'm kidding. Steinberger says he can do his own damn packing.) Both men share the belief that right wing criticism of the U.N. is disingenous partisan hackery designed to shield conservative disrespect for multilateral institutions, but other than that, hey, they have at it. Cool. Steinberger cites four reasons to turf Kofi: The oil-for-food scandal, which, even if it's not the greatest scandal in history, or whatever hacks like me are calling it these days, is still pretty bad, and calls the U.N.'s credibility into question, Darfur, sexual abuse in the Congo, and Kofi's shutting down an internal investigation into sexual harassment by high-level U.N. staffers.

Steinberger's best line:
Defending Annan is not the same thing as defending the United Nations; indeed, to defend Annan at this point is to defend someone whose mismanagement has done grievous harm to the United Nations and to the cause of liberal internationalism.
What he said. Williams actually defends Kofi on the Sudan, although if I'm reading him correctly, he says the real problem is Bush not acting on the Sudan like he did on Iraq, which is an odd thing for a Nation writer to say, but hey, I'm a warmonger, I'll buy it. He minimizes Oil-For-Food for like the nineteenth time, concluding that anyone who talks like its bad is either:
A.) A right-wing shill, or

B.) Trying to placate right-wing shills.
About the U.N. turning a blind eye to sexual abuse that seems to routinely pop up where the U.N. is involved, Williams offers nothing. And then, of course, he concludes with his real defense:
They are not attacking Annan; they are attacking any form of multilateralism, whether the Land Mine Treaty, non-proliferation, the International Criminal Court, or even the Geneva Conventions (all of which he has publicly supported). They were not even attacking the oil-for-food program; they were attacking an organization that dared to say no -- or, at least, refused to say yes -- to Bush's war on Iraq.
It matters not whether the allegations are true - it matters that I really, really, really don't like the people who have publicized them.

Today's post is the first of a three-part debate, with part two appearing Wednesday.

Stuff that ain't funny in Norway or Saudi Arabia... 

...this cartoon.

Tip - The Corner.

Monday, January 24, 2005

Serial killer won't die Wednesday... 

U.S. District Court judge postpones execution of serial rapist/murderer Michael Ross, to allow lawyers not involved in the case to claim Ross is incompetent.

God bless the judicial branch... 

Law prohibiting strippers from fondling customers unconstitutionally vague.

The city of Las Vegas (what, you thought this happened in Sheboygan?) is considering an appeal. I can imagine the day this hits the U.S. Supreme Court...

Clarence Thomas: Why is everyone looking at me all of a sudden?

There's no better time than 50 years ago... 

...but failing that, the present will do. U.N. holds first ever Holocaust memorial. Today, finally, the U.N. will acknowledge and confront the hatred and violence that have convinced so many people that a Jewish state is an absolute necessity, right?
Still, Annan expected the session to be linked to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The General Assembly, which dominated the United Nations at its inception, voted in November 1947 to partition Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. This led to Israel's creation a year later.

"I think whether I like it or not, it is linked in the minds of many people," Annan said.
Oh, well, crawl before you walk, I guess.
Speeches by Islamic countries are to be given by the U.N. ambassadors of Jordan and Afghanistan.
These I gotta hear. (Hey, I'll even admit to being slightly impressed. I assumed the Middle Eastern countries would boycott this entire party. The over under on how long after Afghanistan's speech before somebody takes this as proof that Karzai is a U.S. puppet is 20 minutes.)



Washington shenanigans continue... 

...the West Coast Washington, that is. Washington Democrats are trying to dismiss the court challenge to Christine Gregoire's election and have the matter settled by the legislature, which the Democrats, by incredible coincidence, just happen to control, and you're questioning their patriotism if you think that's even a little bit motivated by partisan interest.

Here's my question. Recall the Democrats demanding an inquiry into the possibility that Ohio was stolen during the Presidential election. 118,000 votes - apparently insufficient to be sure. Gregoire's hundred something margin - good enough, shut up, Dino.

Now, I've read the snotty allegations of Republican hypocrisy in challenging Washington's election while being so quickly accepting of Florida's four years ago. Of course, if principles are supposed to survive four years, surely they can last four weeks. The question - finally, is this: Is there anyone, anywhere, who has explained why it's perfectly reasonable to accept Washington and at the same time question Ohio?

Happy blogiversary! 

...to the Corner! And, in slightly less enthralling news, to me. And in honor of the occasion, I'll do that thing bloggers are best known for: posting someone else's work on my site and swipe their props.

Specifically, this picture of Mishka, taken by my wife, that she and I both think is probably the best picture ever taken of any dog anywhere, ever. I usually cut the size of these things, but this is a damn good picture, and should be seen regulation size.



Now, that's a darn fine looking dog. And even though I made neither the dog nor the picture of the dog, I should get credit somehow. Cause my blog is one year old!

Friday, January 21, 2005

No, nothing that bad... 

The "jury pool from hell" story makes for entertaining reading. The best part:
Another would-be juror said he had had alcohol problems and was arrested for soliciting sex from an undercover officer. "I should have known something was up," he said. "She had all her teeth."
Never had anything that bad happen to me. My best jury pool experience came when picking a panel for a trial on a man charged with DUI and obstruction due to him physically resisting arrest, and I expected a defense claiming in part that the police were the primary aggressors. I asked if anyone had ever had a bad encounter with police officers.

Prospective juror (paraphrased): Yeah, about 20 years ago when I was a kid, I was screwing around, and I ran from the cops, and when they caught me, they beat the hell out of me.

Me (already drawing a line through his name): And did this experience give you a poor impression of the police?

Prospective juror (this is a direct quote): No, sir. I had it coming.
The defendant was found guilty. That guy was the jury foreman. (The defendant in the Tennessee story was found not guilty.)




Blogroll addition 

Petitedov. Go there right now to see a really cool picture of a little dude with a giant ball on his head.

Hero's sendoff... 

Despite China doing its best to downplay the significance of the death of Zhao Ziyang, the former Communist Party head who lost everything after trying to stop the Tiananmen Square massacre, it turns out that people still remember him. A candlelight vigil in Hong Kong in Zhao's memory drew over 10,000 people, showing that plenty of Chinese citizens are well aware of who was willing to put the good of their country ahead of their own self-interest.

Um...I slipped? 

Man arrested for throwing coffee in the face of a meter maid, causing first and second degree burns. He says he slipped.

The young American...ready for any challenge... 

...but dude, not now, it's like, totally summer! So, this being the United States of America, where everything is someone else's fault, he is suing, because being an honor student means never having to say you're busy.

Summer dreams...ripped at the seams
But, (oh) those summer, nights!

Tell me more, tell me more!

Thursday, January 20, 2005

Best. Ad. Ever. 

I don't know if this is real or a parody, but if it's real, this is my next car.

Tip - Blackfive.

Not that I'm complaining... 

But why do we even have second inaugurals? We're not installing a President, nothing's changing, other than "excuse to throw a party", what's the deal?

I was interning in Congress during Clinton's second inaugural, and I liked that just fine, since during inauguration week, "work" involved going to parties and hanging out with all the cool people from the district. But taking the oath and being sworn in as President has already happened, and I just don't see the point.

To be clear - the people who are pissing and moaning about the inaugural and not calling it off and giving the money to Thailand (perhaps so they can buy double-decker Airbuses) are just partisan snipes looking for a reason to complain about the Bush adminstration. I just don't think there should be second inaugurals, period, regardless of the situation at home or abroad.

Tip - Jarvis.

Guam? 

China P.O.'ed at the U.S. for allowing Taiwanese President Chen Shui-Bian to stopover in Guam.

But, hey, on the upside, both Grenada and Vanuatu no longer have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, which really blows Taiwan's chances of having a Survivor winner.

Something I didn't know... 

Apparently, a lot of the houses in Desperate Housewives were from other TV shows and movies, including Leave it to Beaver, Bedtime for Bonzo, Providence, and the Munsters. That's kind of cool.

Tip - Kevin Drum.

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Election photos... 

Iraq the Model has photos of campaign signs from around Baghdad.

Tip - Dave Justus.

Not that I'm bitter... 

...but having spent six pretty much miserable months living in Detroit, it is not without satisfaction that I note that they are now the fattest city in the United States. The good news is, this should pretty much corroborate Cong. John Conyers' claim that he did in fact pass out all those turkeys.

Tip - Grant.

Appearances... 

Apparently the story of the Marine who committed "suicide by cop" to avoid going back to Iraq may not have been the example of a bright young American ruined by George Bush that it was made out to be.

Investigators have stated Andres Raya's unit did not see combat, and his upcoming redeployment was to Okinawa, not Iraq. They also claim cocaine was in his system the night he killed Sgt. Howard Stevenson and wounded officer Sam Ryno.

Not so blue after all? 

I've been referring to the debate over whether to execute serial rapist/murderer Michael Ross in Connecticut as "Red State Justice in Blue America," based on my thoughts that Connecticut is having a general sense of unease at the death penalty called into question by the brutality of Ross' actions. Apparently, however, the dispute is only among those who run Connecticut (Gov. Rell excepted.) The public is squarely behind the plan to execute Ross.

(The polls show the usual drop in support of capital punishment when "life without parole" is presented as an alternative. That's usually the only additional fact presented. When these polls discuss the possibility that a life without parole sentence may be commuted (in states where the option exists), or mention the opposition of victims' families, call me.)

The PR campaign to overturn Connecticut's death penalty has begun, and this statement is sadly, not surprising:
"Unfortunately, his crimes have colored the issue," said Kim Harrison, a lobbyist for the Connecticut Conference of the United Church of Christ and a member of the anti-death penalty group.
I can't imagine how offensive that must seem to the families of April Brunais, Leslie Shelley, Wendy Baribeault, and Robin Stavinsky about how unfortunate it is to think of them when deciding what should happen to their killer. I understand the logic - if you oppose the death penalty in all circumstances, it matters not how many or in what manner a murderer acted. But to truly be effective, to recognize the reality that people will not (and should not) put the crimes aside, you should know who they are. You should know how they died. Otherwise, the boilerplate "yes, I know he did terrible things, and I feel bad for the victims, but..." statement that always precedes an effort to remove them from discussion will be seen as meaningless and empty. And people will not be swayed.

Tip, as always to Kirby's Reports, which has just about everything on the Ross case. Also a lot on the Michael Skakel appeal, for those interested in high-profile cases.

The talented one... 

After missing pretty much all of his sophomore season due to a suspension brought on by an abundance of youthful stupidity, Virginia Tech quarterback Marcus Vick has re-enrolled, started classes, and will be rejoining the football team.

Good luck to him. By most accounts, Marcus is the talented one in the family, and that sets a pretty high bar. (And other bars somewhat less high.)

Could be progress... 

Palestinians announce plans to deploy security on Israel's border to prevent attacks on Israel.

My gut reaction, as it always is when the Palestinians make some overture, is that there's a catch someplace that will render the gesture meaningless. And I know that any action taken to prevent the murder of Israelis is not taken because the PA has a problem with murdering Israelis per se, it's just that it's a bad idea at the moment.

Nevertheless, if the PA is genuinely putting its security forces between Hamas' killers and their targets, it represents a serious step forward that merits as much encouragement as can possibly be given.

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

"Van Gogh'd?" 

A family in Jersey City is murdered by a home invader. The question "why?" is still everywhere, as no one has been arrested yet. One possibility is the simplest of motives - robbery - cash and jewelry were reportedly taken from the home. The possibility that religious hatred was involved has not been, and cannot yet be dismissed, either - the father, a Coptic Christian like his family had been threatened for statements taken to be anti-Muslim. Also, the eldest daughter, who taught Sunday School, was stabbed on the wrist, where she had a tattoo of a Coptic cross. Police and prosecutors are wisely refusing to commit to either theory. Any possible explanation for the crime not fully explored gives the person ultimately charged a potential out at trial. Also, the possibility of religion being involved has already caused tensions, resulting in an uproar at the family's funeral. Local Muslim leaders don't know who did it, but they're sure it wasn't a Muslim:
"We feel this is something that was very far away from our community," Ahmed Sheded, president of the Islamic Center of Jersey City, said after the service. "A real Muslim can't do that."
I'd like to think that Mr. Sheded's call to any Muslim who had any information about the murder to come forward got edited out, and stories about local mosques raising money for the reward fund will be coming out in the next few days. For what it's worth, family members in Egypt agree, and blame America's violent nature for the murders.

Hossam Armanious was 47. His wife, Amal Garas, was 37. Their daughters, Sylvia and Monica, were 15 and 8 respectively.


Unpersons... 

Zhao Ziyang was the chief of China's Communist Party, until 1989, when he fought for a peaceful end to the Tiananmen Square protests, and opposed the eventual massacre of democracy activists that the Chinese government found preferable to giving their people a say in how the country is run.

Now that Zhao died Monday after suffering a series of strokes, the Chinese government is concerned that people might remember that oh, yeah, he was right about all that. So the rest of the world gets a rousing defense of the slaughter of unarmed peaceful protestors, and the Chinese themselves get a big fat "Zhao who?"

And some day soon, it will be like he never led the Party at all.

Someone didn't get the memo... 

On one hand: Palestinian Militant Group Halts Attacks.

On the other: Suicide Attack in Gaza Wounds 6 Israelis.

Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades say one thing, Hamas does another. If one thought the best of Mahmoud Abbas (I don't), one would agree he has his work cut out for him, as Israel has decided that Abbas will have to show he can halt attacks against Israeli civilians before he reaps any of the concessions he promised his electorate he could deliver.

The problem still stems from the same place - the only objection to attacks on civilians comes from the bad P.R. they generate. With that mentality, this group or that group will play a never ending game of three-card monte with suicide bombs, each taking their turn playing peacemaker while the others do the killing.

Single step... 

A South Korean human rights group has reported a videotape that shows a call for democracy written over picture of Kim Jong Il. What's truly amazing is in all the years North Korea has been ruled by the Kims, this is the first suggestion of any kind of dissent recorded from North Korea, which shows how effective a tyrant can be when he has no scruples and no real concern about what the rest of the world thinks.

Instapundit links to this story, which includes a photo of the defaced (man, does that word seem like the wrong one) poster.

I'm sure the poster is gone now, and if the North Korean secret police have any clue, or suspicion, or hunch, or wild ass guess who did it, that person, along with their family, is in a North Korean prison right now, and will probably eventually issue a strong denunciation of such disrespect once sufficient persuasion has been applied. But hopefully, when the powers that be are considering the various deals with North Korea that are being offered, all of which will involve some sort of guarantee for the continuation of Kim's regime, they won't confuse a lack of dissent in North Korea for a desire for Kim's rule.

Monday, January 17, 2005

Sheriff(s) Gone Wild, cont... 

More entertainment from Clayton County - Sheriff Hill claims to have found an excessive amount of jail supplies in storage (more than any moderate to high crime county would need, apparenty), and has asked the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to look into whether there was a sweetheart deal designed to enrich somebody's buddies at taxpayer expense. The previous sheriff has declined to comment, and lawyers for the employees Hill fired are calling the investigation a smokescreen.

Speaking of the fired employees, one of their replacements may not have been the best man for the job - a recently hired deputy (and former Hill campaign volunteer) who was hired without a background check was found to have been investigated for harassing a female college student. Oh, yeah, and he was also arrested Friday and charged with harassing a teenaged girl at the high school he worked at as a security guard. Hill says he could do a better job if it weren't for all this darn attention he's getting. I'm not kidding about that - the story says so right here:
Hill also said the frenetic transition two weeks ago caused him to stray from the due diligence of hiring staff members
...and here:
Hill acknowledges vague working conditions and said they, too, stem from the distraction of intense media scrutiny and county intervention in the sheriff's business.
If Hill works best in private, he's in the wrong business.

From the "I'll Believe It When I See It" file... 

Mahmoud Abbas orders Palestinian security forces to prevent attacks against Israel.

Of course, that's the press release we get. I wonder if that's what the locals are hearing.

No good deed goes unpunished... 

Kid finds bag with $9,000 cash that fell off an armored car truck, hands it in. The kid was at the store to buy Yu-Gi-Oh cards, and his mom said his own money was "burning a hole in his pocket."

Missing from the story is the part where the armored car company bought him every damn Yu-Gi-Oh card ever made, which if they haven't done, they need to get on that in a hurry.

My fellow Americans... 

P.J. O'Rourke suggests a uniting, not a dividing, inauguration speech for Captain Unilateral to give.

My suggested addition? He say this:
"OK, now, during the campaign there was some concern I would re-institute the draft. I want to take this time to reassure everyone that my committment to the all-volunteer military will continue into my second term. In fact, I'd like to ask for volunteers now. Everyone who wants to volunteer for a stint in the army, please signify by standing up, and turning your back on the parade route."

Friday, January 14, 2005

Sheriffic! 

The local saga of the Clayton County Sheriff's Department is the news gift that keeps on giving. Having been ordered to reinstate 27 people he fired, Sheriff Hill put them back on the job. But not their old jobs. Majors and captains, with decades of experience in law enforcement, were put to work in "jail operations", on the same level as 23 year olds holding their first job in law enforcement.
The lawyer representing the workers, Harlan Miller, said Hill just wants to embarrass his clients.

"This is the most degrading, humiliating move he could have made besides have them sweeping the parking lot," Miller said. "I am astonished."
A law enforcement advocacy group has taken the fired deputies side, claiming that the sheriff is abusing his power and calling on the legislature to step in. For his part, Sheriff Hill defends his actions as perfectly consistent with a newly elected leader organizing his department his way. Though most of the fired employees were white, Hill claims race had nothing to do with his decision.

Which is interesting, since according to most observers, race had a whole lot to do with his election. Clayton County, Georgia, was a predominately white county for many years, but the population changed radically over the last decade or so, and now a majority of Clayton County's residents are African-American. The Democratic primary has settles most elections in Clayton County, and this year a number of African-American candidates ran campaigns based in varying degrees on the principle that an black county needed black leaders. Voters responded, replacing not only the sheriff, but also the state's longest serving district attorney, a solicitor general (prosecutor for misdemeanors) who won a statewide award that year, and the county commission chairman. The commission chair, Eldrin Bell, is a former City of Atlanta police chief who has come to the defense of the fired employees.

Hill is currently international news - (they're talking about him in Australia, for Pete's sake.) The issue is really a very quaint, dull one: Do county civil service protections cover employees of the sheriff's department, or do they serve at the pleasure of the elected sheriff? If it's the latter, the truth is, Sheriff Hill is within his rights, however undiplomatic he may be.

Imagine there's no Israel...it's easy if you try... 

..."all the problems in the Middle East stem from Israel's intransigence." No one short of a tenured professor at a Cairo university is actually willing to say this publicly, though several Hamas members are willing to say it from undisclosed locations wearing ski masks. Yet, when listing what's wrong with the Middle East, many commentators mention only things Israel does, or should do. Anything done wrong by anyone else is wrong, of course, but probably something they felt driven to due to Israeli racism/occupation/bad movie start times.

So this mental exercise from Discarded Lies about a world without Israel makes for interesting reading. The premise is that all the internal problems in the Mideast that have nothing to do with Israel are continuing to simmer, and if there was no Israel to foist blame upon, said problems would potentially blow up on a number of fronts.

The idea that removing Israel would improve nothing, and in fact may result in even greater chaos is probably not something that is going to get any play in Palestinian schools, unfortunately. Some interesting reading about how the Palestinians teach their children that the destruction of Israel is a religious duty, and maps contain no Israel all, followed by comments from readers about how darn those Israelis for making the Palestinians do that.

I wonder if the people who cluck their tongues when talking of all the horrible things Israel has driven the Palestinians to do are any of the same people who are going off on Prince Harry for dressing like an idiot. Hey, sure, they think everything in the Middle East is Israel's fault, but they're not anti-Semitic! They wrote a strong letter to the editor of a British tabloid condemning Harry. (But not William, who helped him pick out the costume. Someone as dreamy as William can do no wrong.)

Tip - Winds of Change.

Yeah, that's about right... 



In the year 2005 I resolve to:
Invade a small county.



Get your resolution here.



Tip - Candied Ginger.

Well, there is... 

Career day speaker tells eighth-graders there's money to be made stripping.

Now, sure, maybe it's not your first choice of career for your little girl (or guy - but there's less of a market there). But there are worse careers they could choose. Imagine one day they came home and told you of their dream to be a reality show skank, a producer at CBS News, or even a lawyer.

Then imagine they said "Just kidding! I wanna be a stripper."

You'd be relieved.

8 Simple Rules for Dating Mahmoud Abbas... 

#1. Only a tool of the Zionist conspiracy wouldn't take him to a five-star restaurant.

#2. When you get in the mood, simply refuse to recognize the existence of his pants...

...OK, that's just two simple rules. For eight rules, read Thomas Friedman's Eight Simple Rules for Reporting on the Middle East, which he references in defending going forward with the January 30 Iraqi elections. Money quote as follows:
That civil war was started by the Sunni Baathists, and their Islamist fascist allies from around the region, the minute the U.S. toppled Saddam. And they started that war not because they felt the Iraqi elections were going to be rigged, but because they knew they weren't going to be rigged.

They started the war not to get their fair share of Iraqi power, but in hopes of retaining their unfair share. Under Saddam, Iraq's Sunni minority, with only 20 percent of the population, ruled everyone. These fascist insurgents have never given politics a chance to work in Iraq because they don't want it to work. That's why they have never issued a list of demands. They don't want people to see what they are really after, which is continued minority rule, Saddamism without Saddam. If that was my politics, I'd be wearing a ski mask over my head, too.
Hat tip: Tapped - which considers Friedman "tactless," which, as best I can deduce, means "unpleasantly accurate", since nowhere is it pointed out where his alleged caraicature isn't dead on.


As a fundamental matter of right and wrong... 

...shouldn't it be illegal for Georgia radio stations to play the Michael Bolton version of "Georgia On My Mind?"

Thursday, January 13, 2005

Help may be on the way... 

For the poor, poor people of the state of Illinois, who rid themselves of George Ryan, only to have their new Governor accused of trading appointments for campaign contributions by none other than his own father-in-law. (All of which could have been avoided if Illinois had just elected Glenn Poshard in 1998, who knew what a snake Ryan was well before any grand juries figured it out.)

It with great hope that I read that Republican Congressman Ray LaHood, a solid conservative well liked by Illinoisians on both sides of the aisle (my liberal mother has voted for him several times, despite a lifetime rating of 74 from the American Conservative Union), is seriously looking into the idea of running for Governor in 2006.

Blagojevich let down a lot of people who were hoping he would lead the state away from its status as ethical laughingstock. LaHood is probably the most respected Republican in Illinois, which unfortunately, at the moment is kind of like being the best player on the Atlanta Hawks. But he would mount a strong challenge, and a LaHood-led Republican party could go a long way towards making Illinois a two-party state again.

(Full disclosure - I interned for Cong. LaHood on two separate occasions - the summer of 1995 and the spring of 1997.)

Is it wrong of me... 

...to think this Maureen Dowd column claiming the most accomplished, successful powerful women can't get dates because neanderthal men can't handle their awesomeness is somehow related to her recent dating experiences. (Or lack thereof.)

Hey, I did my part. I married someone with more degrees who makes more money than me. (Which I spend like Armstrong Williams roaming the mall with Dubya's Visa card.) It's not a bad life.

On what I'm sure is a completely unrelated note - the table dancing, ass kicking girlfriend of a mediocre quarterback was acquitted of assaulting said QB's ex-girlfriend.

Those wacky Chinese... 

South Korean legislators, visiting China to investigate the plight of North Korean refugees, who are usually returned to Kim Jong-Il's workers paradise unless if caught, try to give a press conference about their findings. The Chinese send a mob to raid the place and rough up the reporters.

Chinese take on it after South Korea complains: Well, those damned Koreans shouldn't have, you know, talked and stuff.

Get yer 2008 Summer Olympic Merchandise early.

The Law and Order way out of trouble.... 

Don't agree with me? Is it because I'm a lesbian?

CBS - saving us from ourselves... 

No, I'm not talking about the news department. I'm referring to them axing "The Will" after only one show. I must confess, I flipped to this for a few minutes during the boring part of the Jets - Chargers game, and it got addicting in a hurry, especially watching trophy wife Penny threatening everyone in sight to try and force the competition out of the picture. As a reality show villian, she had the potential to make Omarosa look like that simpering ninny Rob dumped on the finale of the first "For Love or Money" and WHY THE HELL DO I STILL REMEMBER THAT?

Oh, well, now we'll never know.

We are your overlords, and you will act accordingly 

Pair telling lawyer jokes in a courthouse get arrested for disorderly conduct. The reason, of course, is they told that tired "How can you tell if a lawyer is lying?" joke. They should have told a better joke, for instance:
Q: What do you have when you have a lawyer buried up to his neck in the sand?
A: Not enough sand.

Q: What's black and looks good on a lawyer?
A: A Rottweiler

Q: What's long and brown and hangs from an asshole?
A: A lawyer's necktie.

"Is it because I'm a lesbian?" 

Where in the f#@* did that come from?

Good news on Alias, though, that being Weiss isn't dead. Seeing him actually making progress with Nadia, I was sure yesterday was his last night on earth.

Wednesday, January 12, 2005

What every football team needs... 

A kicker willing to talk trash like a linebacker.

Dome-boy better hope he can back it up outdoors. Kicking in New England in January ain't quite like the climate controlled peacefulness of Indy.

Hey, it's a tough job... 

Texas D.A. charged with possession of meth.

Separation of Church and State? Nah! 

Church files legal challenge to execution of serial rapist/murderer. Now, if you're me, religious people are perfectly welcome to try and influence public policy, even if faith is the main reason for their involvement. This would include simply speaking out, or, if appropriate, attempting to use the legal system. Getting involved is their right as part of society, regardless of whether or not one agrees with their ultimate goal.

Of course, this will come as bad news to anyone who has ever felt that religious participants in policy debates were "trying to force their religious beliefs on society as a whole," say, in the context of an abortion debate. I'm sure they will be quick to go after the Connecticut Church of Christ's attempt to compel the state to follow their religion.

Because I believe.

Stuff I wonder... 

Why sucky NFL quarterbacks still manage to have Playboy Bunnies get in fights over them?

Doesn't she get mocked at the Playboy mansion by the girls who date players that don't suck?

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

Celebrity jury duty... 

If you shouldn't have picked a talk show host, and you didn't want a Senator, how would you feel about a sitting United States Supreme Court Justice sitting on your jury? Justice Stephen Breyer was ultimately not selected. My gut - in a criminal case, he'd be a good defendant's juror, although that's a big risk to take selecting him, since the jury would almost certainly come back the way he felt. Better not to risk it.

The 80's live again... 

Motley Crue frontman Vince Neil gets married. The ceremony is presided over by MC Hammer.

I saw Vince Neil in concert once. He opened for Poison. (In 2003, of which I am not the least bit ashamed.) He was actually pretty good, even though you could see how much weight he'd put on from the lawn seats. (At least he put on a good show when he played Crue songs. When he played his solo stuff, I was in the bathroom or checking the souvenier stands.)

I've also seen Hammer live, but that was back in 1990. It was a good show. Vanilla Ice opened for him. He wasn't bad. (Keep in mind, at this point, "Ice Ice Baby" had been played maybe three times on the radio total.)

Root causes, part 352, 

The Israeli military is seeking legal approval of a plan to eliminate weapons smuggling in the Gaza Strip that would result in the destruction of up to 3,000 Palestinian homes. Saeb Erekat is, of course, outraged:
"Any of the three proposals constitute a human disaster for the Palestinian people," Erekat said.
Could somebody, anybody, please get Mr. Erekat on record as to why he thinks the Israelis would do something like this? And, better yet, whether Israel has some international legal obligation to stand by and do nothing while Erekat's buddies shell Israeli towns from the very area in question?

Any response that says such attacks are bad because "they harm the cause" will be summarily ignored. If "Bad PR" is the best reason you can come up with to stop launching rockets at civilians, you're the reason homes are being destroyed to dig a trench.

Fake outrage over, business as usual resumes. 

Europe apparently believes nobody is upset anymore over Cuba's 2003 crackdown on dissidents and human rights activists. (The sort of people referred to as worms by the sort of people who think Che Guevara T-shirts are cool.) So, despite no reform from Cuba, or even nice-sounding words talking about considering the formation of a committee to discuss the possibility of a working group that will draft a reform proposal, Cuba and Europe are back to business as normal.

Yeah, yeah, I know. Leftists of all stripes are truly outraged at Castro's contempt for human rights, and they do actually do stuff about it, and right-wingers who point out the tiny, tiny sliver of people who actually admire the bastard are tired hacks who can't get over the cold war, and in any event are perfectly OK with Musharraf or Karimov or some other such dictator. The fact that I never see something doesn't mean it isn't there.

Big time... 

It's always news when a blogger attracts mainstream media attention. So I am pleased to note that this Doug Bandow column cites none other than Liberal Larry at Blame Bush. I'm sure Larry deserves all the accolades he can get about his ability to get under the skin of the vast right-wing media conspiracy.

(Note - I emailed Mr. Bandow with, um...some suggestions as to how to deal with Larry's rhetoric in the future. In the interest of furthering the national debate, of course.)

Monday, January 10, 2005

I ain't no G, I'm just a regular failure... 

Put me down in the "rolling my eyes" category of people reacting to the news that Kid Rock will not be playing one of the inaugural celebrations.

Look, I understand the man's full oeuvre is not appropos for a political celebration, but neither do I think it's fair to quote lyrics from back when he looked like this.

Michelle Malkin - who is guilty of quoting 15 year old lyrics - makes the case against, with INDC Journal and Of the Mind defending his Rockness. Jeff Goldstein has a fairly impressive give and take in his comment section about the whole hoo-hah. I don't see why we can't tell Kid Rock to play the Wal-Mart version of his songs, and tell everyone else that Darryl Worley will be on in just a few minutes if you'll bear with us.

See how we care... 

Great Mark Steyn column about the, ahem, "effort" that Muslim states have put forth in providing aid to the mostly Muslim victims of December's Tsunami. Yes, Saudi Arabia, et al are being very stingy, and the fact that their compassion for their religious brethren pales in comparison to Australia's should come as a surprise to no one, but let's give credit where it's due, there is a predominantly Muslim country, that frankly has enough problems of its own, that nevertheless is finding a way to help out.

Afghanistan is sending doctors, medicine, and equipment to the stricken area. Of course, they're asking for U.S. help with transport. Because who knows how many people would die waiting for the frickin' Saudis.

Tips - Winds of Change; Alarming News.

Clean highways are Klan-tastic! 

Want to trade free publicity for picking up trash? Gotta let the Klan participate. The state of Missouri has been trying for several years to boot the Klan out of their Adopt-a-Highway program for several years, meeting with no success. (And they most likely deserve no success. "But we like the Boy Scouts, the Elks Club, and the Daughters of the American Revolution, and we HATE the KKK!" is pretty much the only argument ever presented on behalf of the state's differing treatment of applicants, and while it's a perfectly understandable sentiment, it is devoid of legal merit.)

It should be noted that the people of Missouri have their own take on the Klan's civic mindedness. Every time the Adopt-a-Highway sign is posted with the Klan's name on it, it vanishes within hours.

Awhile back, the Klan tried to support some Public TV program. I wonder how that case worked out/is proceeding.

Our good friends, the Chinese... 

Taiwan and China are in talks to resume direct flights, which on its face would represent an impressive advance in cross-straight relations. (Well, intermediaries are in talks - China refuses to deal directly with Taiwan, since you know, Taiwan has no right to speak for itself.)

On the other hand, China is also laying a solid level of manure to provide cover for what some believe will be their inevitable invasion of Taiwan, as they will likely pass some variation of a law making Taiwanese self-determination illegal. A popular line of thought in China is that the U.S. is all talk and no walk when it comes to defending Taiwan. In that vein, this Dave Justus post is worth reading as well.

But would it work here? 

Interesting article about TV advertising for Iraq's elections.

Apparently, Al Iraqiya, the US based channel that is the only nationwide TV station, is running ads free, and apparently assisting candidates with production (most ads look the same.) Al Sharqiya, a popular satellite channel, is running PSA's encouraging citizens to vote, and is charging small fees for campaign ads to avoid being seen as profiteering from the election. (In contrast, I'm sure there's at least one Florida TV station mananger who now owns a boat named Bush v. Kerry.) A smaller party is concentrating on text-messaging potential supporters. Nobody is running attack ads either, even though Iyad Allawi is, shall we say, not terribly well-liked.

If you support public financing for US campaigns, root for Iraq's election to have high turnouts.

Friday, January 07, 2005

Alberto Gonzales - The Musical! 

Having not followed the Alberto Gonzales confirmation hearing in much detail, I nevertheless felt inspired to bring to you the following musical number - that would have enlivened the proceedings a great deal...

(To the tune of "The Inquisition Song" from "The History of the World, Part I")

SENATE DEMOCRATS KICK STEP INTO THE ROOM

SENATE DEMS:

The confirmation (Let’s go Al)
The confirmation (He’s our pal)
An explanation, he must now provide
Our aggravation (from election day)
Because the nation (didn’t go our way)
So we’ll substitute his ass for Bush’s hide


TED KENNEDY:

Be straight – on the level
Don’t wait – be a man
Confess – you’re the devil
Or better yet, say it all was Rumsfeld’s plan!

The confirmation (Man, we’re pissed!)
The confirmation (Screw Bill Frist)
It’s a sensation, at least it is this week!
Cause the confirmation lets us hear ourselves speak!


PAT LEAHY:

I was ready to support you, till I thought about this torture
And at first I thought “My God, Ashcroft’s perverse!”
Till I heard he was resigning, so I went and changed my timing
Cause I’realized Gonzales is much worse!
Say you’re sorry! Say you’re wrong!
Say Al Gore should have been President all along!


SENATE DEMS:

The confirmation (Tell everyone)
The confirmation (That you’re scum)
Prevarication’s the order of the day
Cause the confirmation’s here, and it’s here to -


Hey there Gonzales, what do you say?

ALBERTO GONZALES:

I just got back from Guantanamo Bay

SENATE DEMS:

Guantanamo Bay? Where’s Guantanamo Bay?

ALBERTO GONZALES:

It’s where you go when you don’t see things Dubya’s way.

SENATE DEMS:

The confirmation (Feel our scorn)
The confirmation (C-Span porn)
Our motivation isn’t hard to understand!!
All Americans, everywhere
Will finally see how much we care
And see Pat Leahy’s well prepared demands!
Cause the confirmation lets us all grandstand!!!


Merit pay for teachers 

A former chairman of IBM has written in defense of merit pay for teachers. Such a system would reward teachers like my high school calculus teacher, the finest educator ever, while forcing the teacher who promised to turn cartwheels the day I left school to take a second job at Burger King. (She falls short because she did not deliver said cartwheels.)

Kevin Drum rebuts. In his opinion, merit evaluations work well in the private sector because the evaluators work closely with the employee regularly, while principals who would presumably evaluate teachers spend little time actually observing them teach.

I think if you can't figure out who the good ones are and who the bad ones are, you're either not paying attention, or you're not very bright. But I also don't know that a boss has to work with you that closely to tell how you do your job. The people who evaluate me almost never see me in court, and haven't sat through a trial with me since my first couple. But, by consulting the people who are in the courtroom, talking to my co-workers, and measuring the number of fires that have to be put out, I think they have a reasonable basis to say whether I'm doing my job well or not, despite not actually seeing me in action all that much.

All this, of course, assumes my next raise goes through.

They're learning... 

Famous people on juries - not a good idea.

People took the hint - John McCain got called for jury duty, hung out, answered questions from jurors, got ignored when he talked about Republican stuff, got surrounded by the press when he dissed the President, you know...the usual for people called to jury duty. In the end, some guy's DUI trial went on without him.

Thursday, January 06, 2005

Not exactly how I recalled it... 

In defending Hollywood from an attack claiming that there was little appreciation for the gains Afghan women faced as a result of the U.S. toppling the Taliban, Matthew Yglesias tries to pull a fast one:
Yet I don't recall a single Hollywood feminist expressing gratitude to the U.S. military or its commander in chief for the liberation of Afghan women. No doubt Streisand, Sarandon & Co. were too busy inveighing against the horrors perpetrated by John Ashcroft.
Fortunately, one of the virtues of the Internet age is that you don't need to depend on what Boot recalls. Thanks to the magic of Nexis, I found a December 6, 2001, Guardian article reporting that "Mainstream websites are fairly keen on self-censorship, and include the likes of Barbara Streisand removing anti-Bush remarks in the interests of 'national unity.'" Then there's the Associated Press' coverage of the November 2001 Emmy Awards:
Sunday's show featured a new tribute to entertainers who visit troops during wartime, and included a surprise finale by Barbra Streisand, singing "You'll Never Walk Alone" before a wall decorated with the names of Sept. 11 victims.
That's how much she hates America.
"Felt bad for victims of 9/11" DOES NOT EQUAL "Down with boot-kicking the Taliban out of power." Plenty of people (not a majority, by a long shot, but enough to note) thought the way to deal with 9/11 involved retrospection, dialogue, and absolutely no removing of any other governments, no matter how odious. Said people include plenty of celebrities (who was it who said "The way to avoid war is not to have any enemies"?), and political thinkers on the left of the aisle, with maybe one exception, depending on whether you can convince the right to take back Pat Buchanan. (And while I can certainly see why you'd want us to, um...no.)

As Yglesias points out -
The notion that the Bush administration invaded Afghanistan in order to help Afghan women is, of course, preposterous. Look at his remarks from the time and you'll see that though the Taliban's oppression was certainly mentioned, the war was motivated by the small matter of 9-11 and al-Qaeda. Equally preposterous is the suggestion that feminists are or were unconcerned with the fate of Afghan women. When I heard this stuff in the winter of 2001-2002, I assumed it reflected a kind of ignorance coming from the right. Years after the evident, it's just a kind of malicious slander. Check out the Feminist Majority Foundation's Afghanistan page and take note of the fact that, unlike Boot and his friends, their interest in this topic didn't begin in September of 2001.
Not the point. Point is this - In starting a war to build an oil pipeline through Central Asia, or whatever conspiratorial nonsense was floating around at the time - the coalition that invaded Afghanistan has done a lot for the cause of Afghan women. People who support the liberation of Afghan women, you'd think, would recognize that, even if they don't agree with the guy who gave the order on anything else.

Unless, of course, nothing good can happen if George Bush gets any credit for it.

NRA's man of the year... 

Ngoc Le, who despite Rosie O'Donnell's best efforts, nevertheless, still managed to have a gun on him the day a serial rapist held his wife at knifepoint. Sean Connery's admonition about bringing a knife to a gunfight proves as true today as it did in the days of Elliot Ness.

Tip - Southern Appeal.

I'm sorry, Dino. .. 

I take it all back. If 118,000 votes isn't enough to tell you who a state wanted as President, if the people who were so sure that Al Gore's 500,000 popular vote edge deprived Bush of any moral authority to govern suddenly find themselves unmoved by a 3,000,000 vote margin, and if nobody's going to laugh Hillary Clinton all the way back to Arkansas for saying she'd be for this no matter who won the election, then knock yourself the hell out. Have your boys file court challenges. Point out people counting provisional ballots without going to the trouble of determining if they're valid. Paint the freaking state Ukraine orange.

Does anyone remember Michael Moore on the Tonight Show after the election? Humorous and dignified in defeat, in front of a mainstream audience, not once did Mr. Courageous in the Face of Repression suggest that Bush did not actually win said election, probably because picking an election fight would have gotten him booed out of the building. Yet apparently when away from the people he supposedly wants to enlighten, he's all "Ohio was stolen". Fine. I'm hip. So was Washington.

So bring it, Dino. Bring it, sing it, ring-a-ding ding it. Bloggers joining the mockery include Karol (who I must admit was right all along about the whole Washington thing), and Marc, who has much on the protest, just start scrolling.

Wednesday, January 05, 2005

I missed out on Rathergate... 

...I'll be damned if I miss out on Turkeygate. Detroit Congressman John Conyers, who's busy trying to prove Kerry won Ohio, (but probably thinks Dino Rossi needs to take his beating like a man) took 60 turkeys from a Detroit food bank that he said he was going to distribute to poor constituents. Despite promising to account for how the turkeys were distributed, Conyers' office hasn't told anyone what they did with said birds. A federal court worker (and presumbably not-so-destitute) has said they were offered free turkeys by a Conyers staff member, and Conyers' staff apparently haven't been able to settle on what happened. The Detroit Free Press - (Motto: A great paper for a crummy town!) has coverage here and here.

Marc at Hubs and Spokes gets in at a slightly lower ground floor here. Conyers could probably dissolve the controversy with a quick release of where the turkeys went, and a little self-deprecating quip about office management. And the Atlanta Hawks could win the NBA championship if stuff happened that ain't gonna happen in this universe. Conyers has been in office for 40 years. His heavily Democratic district ensures he never faces a serious challenge for re-election. We should be getting a "How dare they question my devotion to the poor!" statement any minute now, and his defenders will point out that his critics are right-wingers, and expect that to settle the matter.

This could be fun.

What a way to go... 

At some point this season, Assistant D.A. Serena Southerlyn will leave Law and Order, freeing up Elisabeth Rohm to be bland and uninteresting somewhere else. (This was announced this summer that she was leaving - I'm sure the only reason Dawn didn't post on it before today was because now that her last episode is approaching, it's a bigger deal then back when L & O was just reruns.)

Just wondering - what kind of exit is she going to get? Resign, die, what? So far, I'd say the best exit was Alexandra Cabot on SVU, during the episode "Lost". (I was never crazy about them killing Claire.) Although I've never seen how my favorite ADA left - what happened to Abby Carmichel?

It's time... 

Alias starts tonight.

The season long death of Vaughn begins today.

Farewell to a legend... 

Rest in peace, Will Eisner - even if you never read him, if you loved comic books, he was one of the reasons why.



Tuesday, January 04, 2005

There's a new sheriff in town... 

A newly elected sheriff in Metro Atlanta, elected with a promise to "clean house", comes in and fires several long-term Sheriff's department employees. In a slightly unusual move, the new Sheriff had snipers posted on the roof of the jail as the fired employees were escorted out, and has a contingent of bodyguards around his person and home.

Sheriff Hill compares his situation with that of DeKalb County Sheriff-elect Derwin Brown - a local hero gunned down in his driveway shortly after winning election. Brown's defeated rival was convicted of murder and was sentenced to life in prison. Exactly who might be gunning for Sheriff Hill is not mentioned. Also, Hill's housecleaning lasted about a day, as a judge has ordered him to rehire the fired employees. One can rest assured this ain't over.

Vote or Die, (Palestinian Version) 

Richard Gere is doing a get out the vote ad for the upcoming Palestinian election. (Gere appears with people who have lionized suicide bombers and Hitler, and called for the destruction of Israel, but hey, voting is good, so never mind, right?) Also, it's keeping him from making Mothman Prophecies 2.

The get out the vote ad for Iraq is probably filming as we speak.

I knew there was a reason I didn't like this guy... 

...last year, Seattle Running Back Shaun Alexander cost my fantasy team a game when he missed the first half of a Seahawks game for a completely ridiculous reason. (I mean, really, it wasn't like he was having the baby. His wife had it covered. It's game time, Shaun!)

And now, as if that weren't bad enough, with a division title and a chance to open the playoffs at home, what's on Alexander's mind? Why, coming up a yard short of winning the NFL rushing title, of course!

(Context - Seattle on 1 yard line in close game. With everyone probably expecting Alexander to run, coach calls QB sneak, QB rushes in for touchdown. Seattle wins game, division, and home field for 1st round of playoffs. Alexander loses rushing title (and any attendant bonus) by one yard.)

Alexander has since apologized for saying Coach Mike Holmgren "stabbed him in the back" and has agreed the sneak was the best play.
Alexander said he hadn't spoken with Holmgren. He said he doesn't feel he must apologize in person to his coach or teammates, saying they know him well enough to realize he puts winning first and statistics second.
Quick quiz: Which statement did Mr. Winning First and Statistics Second make in the heat of the moment?

A. "All right! Won the game, won the division! Bring on St. Louis!"

B. "We were on the freakin' goal line, and I got stabbed in the back."
Go Rams!

The start of something big... 

Kofi Annan picks a new UN chief of staff, in what either is, or will be spun as, the start of grand reforms.

And hey, remember, they're looking to repair relations with Washington.

[obligatory skeptical wise-ass remark] "Sure, now that Christine Gregoire has been certified as governor, they're all about good relations with Washington!" [/obligatory skeptical wise-ass remark]

[voice of reason] "Not that Washington, you nitwit!" [/voice of reason]

But, as Matthew Yglesias notes, getting the U.S. and the U.N. back on the same page will require talking to the party that actually runs the U.S.

[voice of multinational coalition-builder] "But Republicans are icky!" [/voice of multinational coalition-builder]

[reassuring voice] "There, there. Would you like to talk to Robert Mugabe instead?" [/reassuring voice]

[voice of multinational coalition-builder] "Oh, thank you!" [/voice of multinational coalition-builder]


Blogroll addition... 

Grant, at Random Acts of Discombobulation. Always glad to run across a fellow Atlantan in blogdom.

Monday, January 03, 2005

I really don't mean to pile on the UN... 

...OK, I mean to pile on the UN. But it wasn't like, my plan when I woke up this morning. But I did read a bunch of stories about how the UN, supposedly the only credible provider of international aid, is apparently sound and fury signifying damn little, and is apparently also taking credit for stuff they're not, technically speaking, doing.

According to some, this is a pattern that occurred in Afghanistan as well. Take heart, however. A number of supporters of the U.N. corralled Kofi Annan and had what can only be called a "come to Jesusland" meeting. So the problem should be cleared up any day now.

Are all victims created equal?  

How much should we listen to the families of murder victims when sentencing their loved ones' killers?

The sister of one of the girls raped and strangled by a Connecticut serial killer is looking forward to seeing him executed. Does she have a unique insight as to the gravity of the crime? Does she know, better then most, what the killer has taken and what damage he has done? Or does her grief blind her to greater truths and leave her incapable of distinguishing justice and vengeance?

If it's the latter, would a family member who opposed the death penalty have an opinion worth considering by the rest of us?

I've always thought it offensive that people would pat victims on the head and say "Of course I understand how you feel. You have every right to want them dead," then turning around and telling everyone else "These folks are blinded by grief and bloodlust. Pay them no mind." Especially because these same folks would gladly cite a member of Murder Victim's Families for Reconciliation as people with a unique insight into what constitutes justice. And yes, the same is true when prosecutors work to silence family members who oppose the death penalty. No prosecutor should ever be the reason a victim isn't heard, even if he disagrees with what the person has to say.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Site Meter Blogarama - The Blog Directory Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com